@article{10.11648/j.jcebe.20261002.11,
  author = {Suresh Aluvihara and Ferial Pestano-Gupta and Abdul Wahab Hekmat and Mustafa Ben Hkoma and Mohammad Hamid Omar and Jaafar Omar Baomar and Al Rabaki Khaled Awadh},
  title = {Stabilization Pond System and Design Aspects in Wastewater Treatments: A Review},
  journal = {Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering},
  volume = {10},
  number = {2},
  pages = {25-39},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jcebe.20261002.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20261002.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jcebe.20261002.11},
  abstract = {Stabilization ponds are among the oldest, simplest, and most sustainable wastewater treatment technologies, vital for decentralized systems, rural communities, and developing regions where conventional high-tech solutions are not feasible. These large, shallow basins use natural biological and physical processes for organic matter degradation, nutrient removal, and pathogen inactivation. Treatment depends on sedimentation, anaerobic and aerobic decomposition, and a symbiotic algae-bacteria relationship. During daylight, algae produce oxygen via photosynthesis, supporting aerobic bacterial degradation and ammonia nitrification, while bacteria provide CO2 and nutrients for algal growth. Solar UV radiation, natural die-off, and predation further inactivate pathogens. Systems are typically arranged in series for efficiency as anaerobic ponds in deep, high organic loading, for preliminary decomposition and solids removal, facultative ponds with intermediate depth, the main treatment unit with both aerobic (upper) and anaerobic (lower) zones for bulk BOD reduction and maturation ponds with shallow, low loading, for effluent polishing and extensive pathogen removal. Design is critical for performance. Key parameters are hydraulic retention time (HRT), which governs treatment efficiency, organic loading rate (OLR), which controls degradation, pond depth, and series configuration. Climatic factors like temperature and sunlight strongly influence biological activity and must be accounted for. Inlet/outlet structures, liner sealing, and land availability are also essential. Advantages include very low capital and operational costs, minimal energy needs, resilience to hydraulic and organic shock loads, effective pathogen removal, and low requirement for skilled labor. Limitations are the large land area needed, potential odor from anaerobic or overloaded ponds, and effluent turbidity from algae that may require post-treatment to meet strict discharge standards. In conclusion, stabilization ponds remain a reliable, cost-effective, and environmentally sound cornerstone of sustainable wastewater management, with ongoing design improvements enhancing their role in global sanitation.},
 year = {2026}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Stabilization Pond System and Design Aspects in Wastewater Treatments: A Review
AU  - Suresh Aluvihara
AU  - Ferial Pestano-Gupta
AU  - Abdul Wahab Hekmat
AU  - Mustafa Ben Hkoma
AU  - Mohammad Hamid Omar
AU  - Jaafar Omar Baomar
AU  - Al Rabaki Khaled Awadh
Y1  - 2026/10/29
PY  - 2026
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20261002.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.jcebe.20261002.11
T2  - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering
JF  - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering
JO  - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering
SP  - 25
EP  - 39
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-267X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20261002.11
AB  - Stabilization ponds are among the oldest, simplest, and most sustainable wastewater treatment technologies, vital for decentralized systems, rural communities, and developing regions where conventional high-tech solutions are not feasible. These large, shallow basins use natural biological and physical processes for organic matter degradation, nutrient removal, and pathogen inactivation. Treatment depends on sedimentation, anaerobic and aerobic decomposition, and a symbiotic algae-bacteria relationship. During daylight, algae produce oxygen via photosynthesis, supporting aerobic bacterial degradation and ammonia nitrification, while bacteria provide CO2 and nutrients for algal growth. Solar UV radiation, natural die-off, and predation further inactivate pathogens. Systems are typically arranged in series for efficiency as anaerobic ponds in deep, high organic loading, for preliminary decomposition and solids removal, facultative ponds with intermediate depth, the main treatment unit with both aerobic (upper) and anaerobic (lower) zones for bulk BOD reduction and maturation ponds with shallow, low loading, for effluent polishing and extensive pathogen removal. Design is critical for performance. Key parameters are hydraulic retention time (HRT), which governs treatment efficiency, organic loading rate (OLR), which controls degradation, pond depth, and series configuration. Climatic factors like temperature and sunlight strongly influence biological activity and must be accounted for. Inlet/outlet structures, liner sealing, and land availability are also essential. Advantages include very low capital and operational costs, minimal energy needs, resilience to hydraulic and organic shock loads, effective pathogen removal, and low requirement for skilled labor. Limitations are the large land area needed, potential odor from anaerobic or overloaded ponds, and effluent turbidity from algae that may require post-treatment to meet strict discharge standards. In conclusion, stabilization ponds remain a reliable, cost-effective, and environmentally sound cornerstone of sustainable wastewater management, with ongoing design improvements enhancing their role in global sanitation.
VL  - 10
IS  - 2
ER  - 

Copy | Download