Wastewater pollution is a critical global challenge, particularly from diverse and potent sources like textile manufacturing, service stations, and clinical facilities. These effluents, laden with an array of harmful substances from vibrant dyes, heavy metals, and processing chemicals in textile wastewater, to oil, grease, hydrocarbons, and detergents from service stations, and the complex cocktail of pharmaceutical residues, pathogens, and disinfectant byproducts from clinical settings pose significant threats to aquatic ecosystems and human health. Traditionally, treating such variegated and persistent pollutants demands energy-intensive and chemical-heavy conventional methods. However, a promising and sustainable approach lies in the ingenious design of constructed wetland systems. Mimicking nature's own filtration and purification processes, these engineered ecosystems leverage the combined power of specific plants (macrophytes), a diverse microbial community, and a porous substrate (like gravel and sand) to effectively treat complex wastewater streams. Within these systems, plants absorb and accumulate pollutants (phytoremediation), microorganisms break down organic matter and transform contaminants, while the substrate physically filters solids and provides an anaerobic environment for specific biochemical reactions. It's a multi-faceted, low-energy, and environmentally benign process. The brilliance of designing a single, integrated wetland system for multiple wastewater streams textile, service station, and clinical lies in its potential for efficiency and resource optimization. Such a system offers a cost-effective, low-maintenance alternative that requires minimal chemical input. Beyond purification, these constructed wetlands can enhance local biodiversity, create valuable green spaces, and even support the reuse of treated water for non-potable purposes. Crucially, the system must be meticulously designed, considering the specific pollutant load, flow rates, and characteristics of each wastewater type to ensure optimal performance and compliance with stringent discharge standards. This holistic approach represents a beacon of sustainable wastewater management, demonstrating how ecological engineering can harness natural purification power to mitigate pollution, protect our planet, and foster healthier.
| Published in | Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering (Volume 10, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jcebe.20261002.12 |
| Page(s) | 40-56 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Wastewater Treatment, Wetland, Nitrogen Cycle, Microbial Activities, Non Edible Plants
| [1] | Metcalfe, P. (2001). Wastewater treatment: The conventional and the alternative. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water and Maritime Engineering, 148(2), 65-72. |
| [2] | Shishir, M. R., and Sarkar, B. (2020). Conventional Wastewater Treatment Technologies: A Review. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 62(1), 1-15. |
| [3] | Verhoeven, J. T. and Meuleman, F. M. (1999). Wetlands for wastewater treatment: Opportunities and limitations. Ecological engineering. 12, 5-12. |
| [4] | Vymazal, J. (2011). Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: From a science to a technology. Ecological Engineering, 37(1), 2-10. |
| [5] | Sundaravadivel, M. and Vigneswaran, S. (2001). Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater treatment. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 31(4): 351-409. |
| [6] | Shutes, R. B. E. (2001). Artificial wetlands and water quality improvement. Environment International, 26(7-8), 441-447. |
| [7] | Wu, H., Zhang, J., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W., Hu, Z., Liang, S., and Liu, C. (2015). A review on the sustainability of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: Design and operation. Science of the Total Environment, 537, 215-227. |
| [8] | Konnerup, D., Koottatep, T., and Brix, H. (2009). Treatment of different types of wastewater in tropical subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Water Science and Technology, 59(1), 173-180. |
| [9] | Cooper, P. (2005). The performance of vertical flow constructed wetland systems for the treatment of domestic wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 51(9), 11-20. |
| [10] | Saeed, T., and Sun, G. (2012). A review of constructed wetlands for the treatment of industrial wastewater. Water Research, 46(12), 4039-4061. |
| [11] | Hoffmann, H., Skaar, R. V., Nordang, U. N., and Ugland, T. (2011). Overview of international experiences with constructed wetlands for agricultural wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Quality, 40(6), 1735-1748. |
| [12] | Imfeld, G., Braud, I., and Le Blan, C. (2009). Constructed wetlands for urban runoff treatment: a review. Hydrobiologia, 634(1), 1-19. |
| [13] | Renou, S., Givaudan, J. G., Poulain, S., Dirassouyan, F., and Moulin, P. (2008). Landfill leachate treatment: Review and opportunity. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 150(3), 468-493. |
| [14] | Reddy, K. R., and D'Angelo, E. M. (1997). Biogeochemical processes in wetlands: Considerations for water quality. Journal of Environmental Quality, 26(5), 1041-1051. |
| [15] | Vymazal, J. (2007). Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Science of The Total Environment, 380(1-3), 48-65. |
| [16] | Kadlec, R. H. (2005). Recent advances in wetland treatment. Water Science and Technology, 51(9), 1-9. |
| [17] | Brix, H. (1993). Wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands: System design, removal processes, and treatment performance. Ecological Engineering, 2(3), 153-162. |
| [18] | Vymazal, J. (2014). Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: A review of 20 years of experience. Ecological Engineering, 61, 1-10. |
| [19] | Langergraber, G., and Haberl, R. (2008). Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in cold climates. Water Science and Technology, 58(1), 1-7. |
| [20] | Brix, H. (1997). Do macrophytes play a role in constructed wetlands? Water Science and Technology, 35(5), 11-17. |
| [21] | Arias, C. A., and Brix, H. (2005). Phosphorus removal in constructed wetlands: Can peat be used as a substrate? Water Research, 39(6), 1122-1130. |
| [22] | Fan, J., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Li, X., Zheng, J., and Zhang, J. (2013). Vertical flow constructed wetlands: A review of design, operation and performance. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 20(4), 1-13. |
| [23] | Lee, E. J., and Song, Y. H. (2007). Effect of external carbon source on nitrogen removal in vertical flow constructed wetland. Water Science and Technology, 56(3), 177-183. |
| [24] | Cieslik, M., Vymazal, J., and Urbaniec-Kopeć, M. (2006). Removal of indicator bacteria in vertical flow constructed wetlands. Water Science and Technology, 54(9), 61-68. |
| [25] | Vohla, C., Koiv, M., Bavor, H. J., Chazarenc, F., and Mander, Ü. (2011). Constructed wetlands for the removal of phosphorus from wastewater: A review. Ecological Engineering, 37(1), 11-24. |
| [26] | Langergraber, G., and Cichy, W. (2007). Advanced treatment of municipal wastewater by constructed wetlands. Environmental Technology, 28(8), 919-928. |
| [27] | Kaseva, M. E. (2004). Performance of a constructed wetland in polishing pre-treated industrial wastewater in Tanzania. Water Research, 38(3), 679-687. |
| [28] | Rai, P. K. (2009). Phytoremediation of heavy metals: A review of environmental and biotechnological aspects. Annals of Biological Research, 1(2), 200-207. |
| [29] | Tanner, C. C., and Sukias, J. P. S. (2011). Subsurface flow constructed wetlands for dairy farm wastewater treatment: A review of design and performance. Water Science and Technology, 64(2), 438-448. |
| [30] | Fletcher, T. D., Shuster, W., Butler, D., and Arthur, S. (2015). Urban stormwater harvesting and reuse: A state of the art review. Water Research, 87, 570-585. |
| [31] | Hatt, B. E., Fletcher, T. D., and Deletic, A. (2009). Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of storm water bio-filtration systems at the field scale. Water Science and Technology, 59(1), 102-110. |
| [32] | Pilon-Smits, E. (2005). Phytoremediation. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 56(1), 15-39. |
| [33] | Sas-Nowosielska, A., Kucharski, J., Małkowski, E., Kuperberg, S., Ankley, G. T., and Galas, J. (2004). Phytoextraction of cadmium and lead from contaminated soils by Brassica juncea and Brassica napus. Environmental Pollution, 128(1-2), 115-124. |
| [34] | Mijatović, I., Kovačević, V., Milutinović, I., and Jovetić, M. (2021). Constructed wetlands for removal of pharmaceuticals from wastewater: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 752, 141973. |
| [35] | Konnerup, D., and Brix, H. (2010). Potential for bioenergy production from constructed wetlands in tropical regions. Water Science and Technology, 61(11), 2827-2834. |
| [36] | Sahu, M. K., and Pradhan, C. (2019). Review on conventional and advanced techniques for wastewater treatment. Materials Today: Proceedings, 18, 4668-4674. |
| [37] | Hadad, H. R., Maine, M. A., and Santander, L. M. (2006). Removal of some pesticides by Schoenoplectuscalifornicus in a constructed wetland. Chemosphere, 63(5), 779-786. |
| [38] | Konnerup, D., Brix, H., and Koottatep, T. (2012). Treatment of domestic wastewater in tropical horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands planted with Phragmitesaustralis and Typhaorientalis. Water Science & Technology, 65(3), 452-458. |
| [39] | Strand, S. E. (1999). Phytoremediation of TCE in wetlands and riparian zones. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 10(3), 241-246. |
| [40] | Sun, G., and Huang, J. (2005). Removal of organic pollutants from wastewater using constructed wetlands. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 17(2), 332-336. |
APA Style
Aluvihara, S., Pestano-Gupta, F., Hekmat, A. W., Omar, M. H., Hkoma, M. B., et al. (2026). Designing of a Wetland System for the Treatments of Different Types of Wastewater: A Review. Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering, 10(2), 40-56. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20261002.12
ACS Style
Aluvihara, S.; Pestano-Gupta, F.; Hekmat, A. W.; Omar, M. H.; Hkoma, M. B., et al. Designing of a Wetland System for the Treatments of Different Types of Wastewater: A Review. J. Chem. Environ. Biol. Eng. 2026, 10(2), 40-56. doi: 10.11648/j.jcebe.20261002.12
AMA Style
Aluvihara S, Pestano-Gupta F, Hekmat AW, Omar MH, Hkoma MB, et al. Designing of a Wetland System for the Treatments of Different Types of Wastewater: A Review. J Chem Environ Biol Eng. 2026;10(2):40-56. doi: 10.11648/j.jcebe.20261002.12
@article{10.11648/j.jcebe.20261002.12,
author = {Suresh Aluvihara and Ferial Pestano-Gupta and Abdul Wahab Hekmat and Mohammad Hamid Omar and Mustafa Ben Hkoma and Jaafar Omar Baomar and Al Rabaki Khaled Awadh},
title = {Designing of a Wetland System for the Treatments of Different Types of Wastewater: A Review},
journal = {Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {40-56},
doi = {10.11648/j.jcebe.20261002.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20261002.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jcebe.20261002.12},
abstract = {Wastewater pollution is a critical global challenge, particularly from diverse and potent sources like textile manufacturing, service stations, and clinical facilities. These effluents, laden with an array of harmful substances from vibrant dyes, heavy metals, and processing chemicals in textile wastewater, to oil, grease, hydrocarbons, and detergents from service stations, and the complex cocktail of pharmaceutical residues, pathogens, and disinfectant byproducts from clinical settings pose significant threats to aquatic ecosystems and human health. Traditionally, treating such variegated and persistent pollutants demands energy-intensive and chemical-heavy conventional methods. However, a promising and sustainable approach lies in the ingenious design of constructed wetland systems. Mimicking nature's own filtration and purification processes, these engineered ecosystems leverage the combined power of specific plants (macrophytes), a diverse microbial community, and a porous substrate (like gravel and sand) to effectively treat complex wastewater streams. Within these systems, plants absorb and accumulate pollutants (phytoremediation), microorganisms break down organic matter and transform contaminants, while the substrate physically filters solids and provides an anaerobic environment for specific biochemical reactions. It's a multi-faceted, low-energy, and environmentally benign process. The brilliance of designing a single, integrated wetland system for multiple wastewater streams textile, service station, and clinical lies in its potential for efficiency and resource optimization. Such a system offers a cost-effective, low-maintenance alternative that requires minimal chemical input. Beyond purification, these constructed wetlands can enhance local biodiversity, create valuable green spaces, and even support the reuse of treated water for non-potable purposes. Crucially, the system must be meticulously designed, considering the specific pollutant load, flow rates, and characteristics of each wastewater type to ensure optimal performance and compliance with stringent discharge standards. This holistic approach represents a beacon of sustainable wastewater management, demonstrating how ecological engineering can harness natural purification power to mitigate pollution, protect our planet, and foster healthier.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Designing of a Wetland System for the Treatments of Different Types of Wastewater: A Review AU - Suresh Aluvihara AU - Ferial Pestano-Gupta AU - Abdul Wahab Hekmat AU - Mohammad Hamid Omar AU - Mustafa Ben Hkoma AU - Jaafar Omar Baomar AU - Al Rabaki Khaled Awadh Y1 - 2026/10/29 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20261002.12 DO - 10.11648/j.jcebe.20261002.12 T2 - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering JF - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering JO - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering SP - 40 EP - 56 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-267X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20261002.12 AB - Wastewater pollution is a critical global challenge, particularly from diverse and potent sources like textile manufacturing, service stations, and clinical facilities. These effluents, laden with an array of harmful substances from vibrant dyes, heavy metals, and processing chemicals in textile wastewater, to oil, grease, hydrocarbons, and detergents from service stations, and the complex cocktail of pharmaceutical residues, pathogens, and disinfectant byproducts from clinical settings pose significant threats to aquatic ecosystems and human health. Traditionally, treating such variegated and persistent pollutants demands energy-intensive and chemical-heavy conventional methods. However, a promising and sustainable approach lies in the ingenious design of constructed wetland systems. Mimicking nature's own filtration and purification processes, these engineered ecosystems leverage the combined power of specific plants (macrophytes), a diverse microbial community, and a porous substrate (like gravel and sand) to effectively treat complex wastewater streams. Within these systems, plants absorb and accumulate pollutants (phytoremediation), microorganisms break down organic matter and transform contaminants, while the substrate physically filters solids and provides an anaerobic environment for specific biochemical reactions. It's a multi-faceted, low-energy, and environmentally benign process. The brilliance of designing a single, integrated wetland system for multiple wastewater streams textile, service station, and clinical lies in its potential for efficiency and resource optimization. Such a system offers a cost-effective, low-maintenance alternative that requires minimal chemical input. Beyond purification, these constructed wetlands can enhance local biodiversity, create valuable green spaces, and even support the reuse of treated water for non-potable purposes. Crucially, the system must be meticulously designed, considering the specific pollutant load, flow rates, and characteristics of each wastewater type to ensure optimal performance and compliance with stringent discharge standards. This holistic approach represents a beacon of sustainable wastewater management, demonstrating how ecological engineering can harness natural purification power to mitigate pollution, protect our planet, and foster healthier. VL - 10 IS - 2 ER -